What are Breach and Attack Simulation/Emulation Tools?
In cybersecurity, Breach and Attack Simulation (BAS) and Adversarial Exposure Validation (AEV) serve distinct yet related purposes in testing an organization’s defenses, particularly against threats like ransomware and insider attacks. BAS focuses on simulating specific cyberattacks using predefined scenarios to validate security controls, targeting known tactics, techniques, and procedures (TTPs) such as phishing or data exfiltration. While effective for testing anticipated vulnerabilities, BAS relies on static, playbook-based testing, which can miss adaptive attacker strategies and requires significant maintenance due to its agent-based approach.
In contrast, AEV, a broader category introduced by Gartner, encompasses BAS 2.0 and automated penetration testing, emphasizing continuous exposure management across the entire attack surface. AEV dynamically emulates real-world attacker behavior, using algorithm-driven attack propagation to uncover “unknown unknowns” and prioritize risks based on exploitability and impact. Its agentless, autonomous nature reduces operational overhead and adapts in real-time to emerging threats, making it particularly suited for evolving risks like ransomware’s lateral movement or insider threats’ privilege abuse.
While BAS is simpler and sufficient for organizations with basic security needs, it struggles with novel attack paths and lacks the prioritization offered by AEV’s integration with Continuous Threat Exposure Management (CTEM) frameworks. Conversely, AEV’s adaptive approach better addresses today’s sophisticated threat landscape. For organizations facing complex and evolving risks, AEV’s forward-looking methodology provides a significant advantage over traditional BAS.
BAS and, to a greater extent, AEV provide a strategic, proactive approach to strengthening cybersecurity defenses. Unlike sporadic audits or single-point penetration tests, these platforms deliver continuous, automated validation of your security posture, pinpointing strengths, exposing weaknesses, and guiding remediation. Here’s how BAS, and especially AEV, add comprehensive value:
BAS runs simulated attacks based on real-world techniques to uncover threats that may otherwise go unnoticed. These aren't hypothetical threats but they reflect the actual methods used by adversaries, helping your team spot weak points in a safe and controlled way, before attackers do.
Your security stack is only as strong as its weakest point. BAS continuously validates whether your defenses — from EDR and SIEM to DLP and firewalls — are detecting and responding as intended. It helps you move from assumption to assurance, with evidence that your tools are performing as expected in live conditions.
BAS provides clear visibility into how different layers of your security infrastructure are functioning. From endpoint detection to network defense, it shows where signals are being missed or alerts are not triggering, so you can take targeted action, not just guess.
It’s not enough to know there’s a problem — you need to know what to do next. BAS platforms provide contextual, risk-based insights that help prioritize what to fix first. These recommendations are practical and clear, helping teams move quickly from detection to remediation without losing time.
By constantly testing your ability to detect, respond to, and recover from attacks, BAS strengthens your resilience across the kill chain. It helps you evolve your defenses as threats change, ensuring your organization stays agile, responsive, and prepared for whatever comes next.
BAS isn’t one-size-fits-all. Scenarios can be tailored to reflect the specific threats facing your industry, your region, and your organization’s regulatory requirements. This means you’re testing against attacks that matter — not generic simulations — and aligning your defenses with both risk and compliance goals.
Cyber risk is never static, and your defenses shouldn’t be either. BAS enables ongoing measurement and improvement, helping you reduce exposure over time and make informed decisions about where to invest in your security program.
Here are the top 10 Breach and Attack Simulation (BAS) tools along with reviews. The information listed below is based on customer research and customer reviews.
SCYTHE is a leader in adversarial emulation and continuous security validation (AEV), empowering organizations to proactively identify exposures, validate security controls, and measure risk against real-world threats. Trusted by top enterprises and government agencies, SCYTHE enables security teams to automate threat testing, enhance cyber resilience, and maximize security investments.
Features of SCYTHE:
Benefits of SCYTHE
Mandiant Advantage Attack Surface Management
Mandiant Advantage Attack Surface Management is a robust solution designed to help organizations proactively manage and secure their digital footprint. As part of Google Cloud’s Mandiant portfolio, it provides deep threat intelligence on attackers, their tactics, and the evolving threat landscape. With extensive monitoring — including dark web surveillance — and comprehensive reporting, it equips security teams with the up-to-date intelligence they need to detect, prevent, and respond to cyber threats in real time. By aggregating data from networks, malware samples, and external feeds, the platform creates a unified, actionable view of threats, empowering faster, better-informed decision-making.
Features of Mandiant Advantage Attack Surface Management:
Benefits of Mandiant:
Cons:
Cymulate Exposure Validation Platform
Cymulate is a Security Validation and Exposure Management Platform that helps organizations proactively assess and improve their security posture. Leveraging comprehensive Breach and Attack Simulation (BAS) technology, Cymulate continuously tests defenses from the attacker’s perspective, empowering security teams to prioritize remediation and close critical gaps.
Features of Cymulate:
Benefits of Cymulate:
AttackIQ is a Security Optimization Platform that allows organizations to test, validate, and improve their cyber defenses with precision. Built on the MITRE ATT&CK® framework, AttackIQ enables security teams to run continuous, customizable attack simulations that reveal gaps in security controls, misconfigurations, and inefficiencies.
Features of AttackIQ:
Cons:
SafeBreach transforms how organizations approach security by putting their defenses to the test — before attackers can. As a pioneer in breach and attack simulation (BAS), SafeBreach runs continuous, real-world attack scenarios to uncover hidden vulnerabilities and pinpoint where fixes are needed most. Powered by its extensive Hacker’s Playbook™, a constantly updated collection of attack techniques informed by deep threat research, SafeBreach equips security teams with the insights they need to stay ahead of emerging threats and strengthen their defenses with confidence.
Features of SafeBreach:
Benefits of SafeBreach:
Cons:
Picus Security offers a Security Validation and Exposure Management platform aimed at helping organizations assess, prioritize, and address cyber risks on an ongoing basis. By running simulated attack scenarios, Picus helps security teams test the strength of their defenses, uncover gaps, and apply corrective actions to lower the chances of successful attacks.
The platform is designed to integrate with existing security controls, enabling organizations of various sizes to continuously evaluate the effectiveness of their defenses against real-world threats.
Features of Picus:
Benefits:
Cons:
FourCore ATTACK is an advanced breach and attack simulation (BAS) platform that empowers organizations to evaluate the strength of their security defenses through real-world cyberattack simulations. Designed to proactively expose gaps across the attack surface, it leverages the MITRE ATT&CK framework and zero-day attack scenarios to measure the true effectiveness of security controls. By delivering actionable insights from the attacker’s perspective, FourCore helps organizations turn security testing into continuous, meaningful improvement.
Key Features
Benefits
Cons / Challenges
Pentera is an American cybersecurity software company specializing in automated security validation and penetration testing. Founded as Pcysys in 2015 and rebranded as Pentera in 2021, the company offers a platform designed to help organizations continuously identify vulnerabilities and test their defenses across internal and cloud environments. With rapid product evolution and a strong support team, Pentera aims to make automated pentesting an essential part of modern security programs.
Key Features of Pentera
Benefits of Pentera
XM Cyber is a leading hybrid cloud security company revolutionizing how organizations manage cyber risk. Its attack path management platform continuously identifies hidden attack paths across both cloud and on-premises environments, allowing security teams to proactively block threats before they reach critical assets. By prioritizing the exposures that matter most and cutting off attack chains at key points, XM Cyber helps organizations dramatically reduce risk with less effort.
Key Features
Benefits
Cons
SnapAttack helps organizations manage threats through its proactive threat management platform. By integrating threat intelligence, adversary emulation, detection engineering, and purple teaming, SnapAttack empowers security teams to identify and address vulnerabilities before they are exploited. Its cloud-based solution provides continuous validation of defenses, helping organizations stay ahead of sophisticated threats like ransomware and insider attacks across hybrid environments.
Key Features
Benefits
Cons / Challenges