EDR VALIDATION
Is Your CrowdStrike or
Defender Actually Working?
real adversary behavior — so you know, not assume.
| See How It Works Download Datasheet |
|
60%+
reduction in detection MTTR
|
4×
more validation tests run continuously
|
25–60%
improvement in ATT&CK coverage
|
WHY GAPS EXIST
Why EDR Tools Miss Threats
Even When Properly Deployed
A correctly licensed, correctly deployed EDR still misses threats for four predictable reasons.
Configuration driftSecurity policies change, exclusions accumulate, and deployment gaps widen over time. The EDR configured six months ago is not the same EDR you have today. |
Evasion techniquesAdvanced adversaries — and even commodity malware — use living-off-the-land techniques, process injection, and signed binary proxy execution that many EDR policies don't catch by default. |
Untested detection logicMost organizations have never run a real adversary technique against their EDR to confirm it fires an alert. They trust the vendor's ATT&CK coverage map — not their actual environment. |
Regression after changesEvery OS update, EDR agent upgrade, or policy change is a potential regression event. Without continuous testing, you won't know until an attacker finds the gap first. |
WHY GAPS EXIST
EDR validation is continuous, evidence-based, not assumed.
A correctly licensed, correctly deployed EDR still misses threats for four predictable reasons.
Does my EDR detect this specific technique against this specific target system? Does the detection generate an alert in my SIEM? Does the alert trigger the correct SOC workflow? Did a recent change break a detection that was previously working?
THE SOLUTION
How SCYTHE Validates Your EDR
Four validation pillars, running continuously in your live environment, not in staging.
SUPPORTED PLATFORMS
Validated against the platforms your team actually runs.
Bidirectional integrations with the most widely deployed enterprise EDR and SIEM platforms.
Don't see your EDR? SCYTHE's flexible deployment and API-based integration supports most enterprise endpoint platforms. Contact us to discuss your environment.
OUTCOMES
What You'll Know After
Running SCYTHE Against
Your EDR
Clear, actionable evidence, not a list of assumptions
your team has to manually verify.
|
Coverage map
Which MITRE ATT&CK techniques your EDR detects, and which it misses — visualized against the ATT&CK matrix showing actual coverage density, not vendor-claimed coverage.
|
|
False negative rate
What percentage of adversary techniques execute without generating a detection, tracked over time so you can see whether coverage is improving or degrading.
|
|
Alert quality
When a detection fires, does it generate a useful, actionable alert — or alert fatigue noise? SCYTHE measures alert fidelity alongside detection rate.
|
|
Regression history
A timeline of every detection regression: when it happened, what change preceded it, and whether it has been remediated.
|
|
Detection improvement evidence
As your team tunes detection logic, SCYTHE shows the before-and-after — measurable proof that your investment in detection engineering is working.
|
THE BUSINESS CASE
From Assumed Coverage to Measured Assurance
Continuous validation turns assumptions into evidence. Based on customer-reported outcomes.
|
4×
increase in continuously executed detection tests
|
60%+
reduction in detection mean time to respond
|
25–60%
improvement in ATT&CK detection coverage
|
|
"SCYTHE has cut our MITRE ATT&CK testing from days to just moments."
John Strand — Black Hills Information Security
|
COMMON QUESTIONS
Frequently asked questions
Is SCYTHE safe to run against a production EDR?
Will SCYTHE cause false positives in our SOC during testing?
How is this different from running Atomic Red Team or Caldera?
How long does it take to see results?
Know exactly what your EDR is, and isn't detecting.
Book a demo and see SCYTHE run a validation campaign against your EDR environment. We'll show you your actual MITRE ATT&CK coverage, your false negative rate, and your first regression risk areas.