SCYTHE 5.1 Released  Read More
 

 

Adversarial Exposure Validation Platform

Prove your defenses work.
Before attackers do.

Continuous adversarial emulation across IT, cloud, and OT — so you know exactly what your controls catch, and what they don't.

SCYTHE runs real MITRE ATT&CK-mapped campaigns in your actual environment on a continuous schedule — validating detection, alerting, and response against the threat actors targeting your industry right now.

60%+ reduction in detection MTTR
more validation tests run continuously
25–60% improvement in ATT&CK coverage
<48h avg re-test cycle after a gap is fixed

TRUSTED BY

 
Fortune 500
 
Energy Sector
 
DoD Contractors
 
Financial Services
 
Critical Infrastructure
 
Manufacturing Sector
 
Insurance
 
Healthcare

why scythe platform vs. more of the same

The tools you already own aren't the
problem. Not knowing if they are working is.

Security leaders face a specific objection internally: "We already have an EDR, a SIEM, and an annual pen test — what does this replace?" The honest answer is: nothing. SCYTHE doesn't replace your existing stack. It tells you whether your existing stack is catching what it should.

Your EDR vendor validates their product in their lab. SCYTHE validates it in yours — against the techniques being used against your industry, right now. Those are different tests with different answers.

Instead of assuming… SCYTHE proves…
Your EDR catches credential dumping Whether T1003.001 fires in your specific config and environment
Your SIEM rules are correctly tuned Which rules generate actionable alerts vs. noise or silence
Your annual pen test reflects current risk What your controls catch against techniques active in your industry today
Your SOC would catch lateral movement Exactly how long detection takes — and where the chain breaks
That's not a new investment. It's proof that your current investments are working — or the evidence you need to fix them before an attacker finds out first.

PLATFORM CAPABILITIES

Four capabilities. One continuous program.

Each capability is production-safe, fully auditable, and continuously updated with new adversary techniques as the threat landscape evolves. 

Adversarial emulation AI-powered test generation Control validation Detection engineering

Emulate real adversaries, not generic scripts

SCYTHE's campaign library emulates named threat actors mapped to MITRE ATT&CK, from initial access through lateral movement to objectives. Every technique runs in your actual environment against your real controls, not in a sandbox.

Multi-stage attack chains, evasion behaviors, and living-off-the-land techniques are all supported. Campaigns can be scheduled, change-triggered, or run on demand.

Named threat actor emulation Full kill-chain campaigns MITRE aligned Production-safe Multi-stage chains

Screenshot 2026-03-27 at 10.44.48 PM

MEASURED OUTCOMES

What customers see after deploying SCYTHE.

Continuous validation turns assumptions into evidence. Based on customer-reported outcomes.
 
increase in continuously executed detection tests
60%+
reduction in detection mean time to respond
25–60%
improvement in ATT&CK detection coverage
80%+
of routine validation automated, freeing analyst time
<48h
avg re-test cycle after a gap is identified and fixed
30–50%
reduction in false negatives across validated controls

“SCYTHE has cut our MITRE ATT&CK testing from days to just moments.”

John Strand — Black Hills Information Security

SEE IT ACTION

What the platform looks like when it's running.

Five views your team will live in. Each one turns a question that used to take weeks into an answer you have continuously.

01  Dashboard

 
 
 
app.scythe.io / dashboard / overview
Last 30 Days ▾
SCYTHE AEV Dashboard
Adversary Emulation & Validation: Operator-first view of coverage, control efficacy, and run-time health.
Overview
Operator
Defender
MITRE
Custom
Defense Posture
What is our overall defense effectiveness?
Logged
24 of 465
Alerted
35 of 465
Blocked
36 of 465
Defended
58 of 465
465
Total Events
Tests
Active & scheduled
0 active   0 scheduled
0
Attacker success
Attack pass rate
0%
Mean TTD
Time to detect
POOR
60h 24m
Mean TTTE
Time to engage
POOR
26h 20m
Risk Score
Org. risk exposure
62/100
Ransomware
Defense score
13/100
Phishing
Defense score
17/100
Insider Threat
Defense score
12/100
Control Efficacy Trend
How has control effectiveness changed over time?
Mar 19Mar 21Mar 23Mar 25Mar 27Mar 28
→ Pass Rate
ATT&CK Tactic Hotspots
Which tactics generating most issues?
58 TOTAL
Execution52
Discovery5
Exfiltration1

The AEV Dashboard — operator-first view of defense posture, control efficacy, risk scores, and tactic hotspots. All metrics update continuously as campaigns execute.

1

Defense posture gauges

Four dials showing logged, alerted, blocked, and defended outcomes across all 465 events. At a glance you see exactly where the response chain is breaking down.

2

Mean TTD & TTTE — rated

60h 24m to detect and 26h 20m to engage, both flagged POOR. These are the numbers that determine whether your team catches an attacker before damage is done.

3

Threat scenario scores

Ransomware 13/100, Phishing 17/100, Insider Threat 12/100 — scenario-specific scores show exactly which threat categories your controls are least prepared for.

4

ATT&CK tactic hotspots

Execution accounts for 52 of 58 total issues. That's where to focus detection engineering first — not a guess, a measurement.

02  ATT&CK coverage heatmap

 
 
 
app.scythe.io / coverage / heatmap
ATT&CK coverage — live
68% covered
14 gaps
Initial access
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Execution
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Persistence
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Defense evasion
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Lateral movement
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Exfiltration
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Validated
 
Partial
 
Not tested
Updated 4 min ago

Live ATT&CK heatmap — updates automatically as campaigns execute. Gaps surface in real time, not at the end of a quarterly review.

1

Live coverage score

68% of tested ATT&CK techniques validated — updates in real time as each campaign completes.

2

Gap count — always current

14 techniques flagged as untested or failing. Each links to the specific technique, tactic, and affected control.

3

Tactic-level breakdown

Coverage shown by ATT&CK tactic row — see at a glance whether lateral movement or defense evasion is your weakest area.

4

Partial coverage flagged separately

Light blue means the EDR fired but the SIEM alert didn't generate — gaps that only show up when you test the full chain.

03  Campaign builder

 
 
 
app.scythe.io / campaigns / builder
AI-assisted
Campaign builder
Threat scenario input
"Emulate VOLTZITE targeting energy sector OT — focus on IT/OT boundary crossing and living-off-the-land techniques"
Generated — 11 techniques — awaiting approval
Network service scanning
T1046
Discovery
Valid accounts — domain
T1078.002
Initial access
Living off the land — WMI
T1047
Execution
Lateral tool transfer
T1570
Lateral movement
+ 7 more techniques in this campaign
Approve & schedule
Edit

Campaign generated from a plain-language threat description in under 60 seconds. Human approval required before anything executes.

1

Plain language input

Paste a CISA advisory, ISAC bulletin, or describe the scenario. SCYTHE extracts and maps TTPs automatically.

2

ATT&CK mapping — automatic

Every technique tagged with its ATT&CK ID and tactic. No manual mapping required.

3

Human approval gate

Nothing runs without explicit sign-off. AI builds the campaign — your team decides when and where it executes.

4

Full edit control

Add, remove, or reorder techniques before approving. The AI suggestion is a starting point, not a locked plan.

04  Validation results

 
 
 
app.scythe.io / results / APT29-emulation-03-28
APT29 emulation — results
Completed 14:38 today
7
Detected
3
Missed
2
Partial
PowerShell execution — T1059.001
EDR + SIEM
DETECTED
Registry persistence — T1547.001
EDR only
SIEM GAP
Pass-the-hash — T1550.002
SIEM only
PARTIAL
Credential dumping — T1003.001
No controls fired
MISSED
C2 over HTTPS — T1071.001
EDR + SIEM + ticket
FULL CHAIN
3 Jira tickets created automatically — assigned to detection engineering

Technique-level results showing exactly which controls fired, where the chain broke, and auto-created remediation tickets.

1

Detected / missed / partial

The three-number summary tells the story immediately. No hunting through logs to understand what happened.

2

Where in the chain it broke

"SIEM GAP" means the EDR fired but the alert didn't generate. Precision here determines whether the right team fixes the right thing.

3

"Full chain" is the standard

EDR detected, SIEM alerted, SOC workflow triggered. That's what passing looks like. Anything less is a gap.

4

Automatic ticket creation

Gaps create Jira or ServiceNow tickets instantly — pre-populated with technique context and remediation guidance.

05  Purple team exercise

 
 
 
app.scythe.io / exercises / purple-team / Q1-2026
Purple team exercise — Q1 2026
Threat actor: APT29 · 12 techniques · Red + Blue teams active
In progress
5
Detected
3
Tuned live
2
Gaps found
2
Remaining
Live technique log — shared red & blue view
T1055 — Process injectionDETECTED
Red: executed 14:22 · Blue: EDR alerted 14:22:47 · SIEM alert 14:23:01
T1547.001 — Registry persistenceTUNING
Red: executed 14:31 · Blue: EDR fired, SIEM missed · Rule updated 14:38 · Re-test queued
T1003.001 — Credential dumpingGAP
Red: executed 14:44 · Blue: no alert in EDR or SIEM · Ticket #4421 opened
T1550.002 — Pass-the-hashQUEUED
Scheduled next · Both teams ready
Coverage delta — before vs. after this exercise
 
Before: 54%
 
After: 68% (+14%)

Purple team exercise — red and blue teams share a live view of every technique, every detection outcome, and every rule tuned in real time. Coverage improves during the session, not after.

1

Shared operating picture

Red and blue teams see the same log simultaneously. No post-exercise debrief — both sides see outcomes in real time.

2

Rule tuning happens in-session

"TUNING" means the blue team updated the SIEM rule and queued a re-test before moving on. Gaps get fixed during the session, not three weeks later.

3

Coverage delta — measured live

54% coverage at the start, 68% by the end. Leadership can see the program improving in real time, not in a quarterly report.

4

Every session builds the program

Results feed into the cumulative ATT&CK heatmap. Each exercise is a permanent improvement to your detection library.

Ready to see what your controls actually catch?

Book a 30-minute demo. We'll run a live emulation against a technique relevant to your industry.
 

DEPLOYMENTS & INTEGRATIONS

Fits your environment. Integrates with your stack.

 

☁️
Cloud (SaaS)
🖥️
On-premises
🔀
Hybrid
🔒
Air-gapped

Integrations include:

 EDR

CrowdStrikeCrowdStrike Falcon
MicrosoftMicrosoft Defender
SentinelOneSentinelOne
Palo AltoCortex XDR

 SIEM

SplunkSplunk
MicrosoftMicrosoft Sentinel
IBMIBM QRadar
GoogleGoogle Chronicle

 & ITSM + more

ElasticElastic SIEM
ServiceNowServiceNow
AtlassianJira
+ many more

COMMON QUESTIONS

What buyers typically ask.

We already have CrowdStrike and Splunk. Why do we need SCYTHE?

Buying a tool and validating a tool are different investments. CrowdStrike and Splunk are excellent at what they do. SCYTHE answers the question those tools can't answer for you: in your environment, against the specific techniques targeting your industry, does your detection chain actually work end to end?

The EDR fires, but does it generate a usable SIEM alert? Does that alert trigger the right SOC workflow? Does a ticket get created and assigned? Those questions require a platform that sits above and across your stack, not inside a single tool. That's what SCYTHE does.

How is this different from our annual penetration test?

Penetration tests find vulnerabilities. SCYTHE validates controls. Those are different questions.

A pen test tells you where an attacker could get in. SCYTHE tells you whether your detections would catch them if they did, and whether that's still true after your environment changes next week. Annual pen tests produce a point-in-time report that goes stale the day it's published. SCYTHE runs continuously, so your coverage data reflects your environment as it actually exists today, not as it existed six months ago when the engagement ran.

How is SCYTHE different from the built-in validation in CrowdStrike or Microsoft Defender?

Native EDR validation tools test within their own control plane. SCYTHE tests the full response chain — does the EDR detection generate a usable SIEM alert? Does that alert trigger the right SOC workflow? Does a ticket get created? Those questions require a platform that sits above and across the stack, not inside a single tool.

Do we need an internal red team to get value from SCYTHE?

No. SCYTHE is used by organizations at every maturity level, from teams with no red team running automated EDR and SIEM validation, to enterprise red teams running complex multi-stage campaigns. The platform scales to what your team needs. SCYTHE also offers Managed AEV for organizations that want continuous validation without building an internal capability.

How does SCYTHE integrate with existing security tools?

SCYTHE integrates bi-directionally with SIEM, SOAR, EDR, ticketing systems, and security controls. Teams can automate validation workflows, measure detection quality, and optionally suppress SOC alerts during controlled testing to reduce analyst fatigue.

Can SCYTHE support continuous detection engineering?

Yes. SCYTHE enables teams to test SIEM rules, validate new CTI-driven detections, and regression-test detection logic when infrastructure or tooling changes.

How long does implementation take?

Most organizations run their first campaign within hours of deployment. Initial integration with EDR and SIEM platforms is typically completed in one to two weeks. Value compounds as campaigns are scheduled and detection coverage tracking matures over the following weeks and months.

How does SCYTHE handle compliance and audit requirements?

SCYTHE produces defensible, repeatable evidence of control effectiveness, dated test results, technique-level outcomes, and ATT&CK coverage data. This supports frameworks including NERC CIP, IEC 62443, NIST CSF, and TSA security directives, and provides the evidence base auditors and regulators look for beyond documentation alone.

Is SCYTHE safe to run in production environments?

Yes. SCYTHE is designed for production-safe emulation. Every test is controlled, configurable, and scoped to your operational risk tolerance. Destructive capabilities require explicit authorization. All actions are logged and auditable. SCYTHE is widely deployed in live IT, cloud, and OT environments including regulated industries where operational availability is non-negotiable.

How does pricing work?

SCYTHE is licensed based on deployment scope and use case, under a single platform price for enterprise, consultant, or MSSP. Contact us for a scoping conversation and we'll recommend the right fit for your team size and validation goals.

GET EXPERT ADVISE

Cybersecurity strategy with SCYTHE.

SCYTHE turns adversary simulation into a continuous program, not a point-in-time exercise. High-fidelity threat emulation and automated control validation give security teams the evidence they need: what their controls catch, what they miss, and where gaps are widening. Flexible deployment across IT, cloud, OT, and AI attack surfaces means validation keeps pace with the environment, not the other way around.

RESOURCE LIBRARY

Most Downloaded Resources

March 20, 2026

MuddyWater Displaying New Tactics and Intriguing Malware

How MuddyWater Leveled Up Its Game.

March 12, 2026

APT28 — BadPaw / MeowMeow: From Manual Lab to Continuous Emulation

A technical analysis of the APT28 BadPaw/MeowMeow campaign, showing how manual lab simulation and SCYTHE adversarial emulation can be used to…

February 05, 2026

SCYTHE and Starseer Partner to Secure Enterprises Against AI-Driven Attacks

Joint solution brings together advanced adversary emulation and AI assurance to defend enterprises against AI-enabled threats

Contact Us

Welcome to SCYTHE, your partner in understanding and defending against cyber attacks. We appreciate your interest in enhancing your cybersecurity defenses. 

Please fill the form to reach out to our dedicated team.